Rabbi
Jachter's Halacha Files
(and
other Halachic compositions)
A Student Publication of the Isaac and Mara Benmergui Torah Academy of Bergen
County
![]()
Parshat Tzav 11
Adar II 5763
March 15, 2003
Vol.12 No.21
![]()
Gems from Rav Soloveitchik on the Haggada
by Rabbi Chaim Jachter
Introduction
Rav Hershel Schachter recently published a work
entitled “MiPenieni HaRav,” his second volume of collections of Torah insights
of Rav Yosef Dov Soloveitchik. In this essay, we shall present a number of the
Rav’s ideas regarding the Seder that Rav Schachter published in this work.
Ha
Lachmah Anya
The commentaries to
the Haggada pose many questions regarding the introductory section to Maggid, Ha
Lachma Anya. We shall focus on the question regarding the relevance of the
declaration we make at the conclusion of Ha Lachma Anya, “this year we are here,
next year we shall be in the Land of Israel, this year we are slaves, next year
we shall be free.” Many ask why we mention this at the conclusion of Ha Lachma
whose purpose is to invite any who are hungry to come and join us at the Seder.
Rav Soloveitchik cites the Mishna in Bava Metzia 83a to resolve this problem.
The Mishna there relates a story about Rav Yochanan ben Matya who instructed his
son to hire some workers for a particular job. The son proceeded to hire Jewish
workers and he agreed, among other things, to provide them with food. When the
son told the father what he did, the father became concerned regarding the fact
that the son did not specify to the workers what type of food he agreed to
provide them. The father ordered his son to immediately tell the workers before
they started the job that he agrees to provide them with only an average meal.
Rav Yochanan explained that without specifying otherwise, the workers enjoyed
the Halachic right to demand the most lavish meal imaginable. This is because
the descendants of Avraham, Yitzchak, and Yaakov, are entitled to the finest
treatment possible.
Similarly at the Seder, explains
Rav Soloveitchik, when we invite a Jewish person to the Seder they are entitled
to the most lavish meal imaginable unless we specify otherwise. Hence, when we
extend an invitation to poor people to attend our Seder, we indicate that in
principle they are entitled to the finest meal possible. However, due to our
current pre-Messianic circumstances we are unable to provide them with such a
meal. This indication raises the self-esteem of the poor guests as we gently
imply that their status as Jews endows them with “VIP status” and that anything
we give them is less than what they deserve.
Vehee Sheamda
Why do we mention at the Seder that in
every generation there are people who seek to destroy the Jewish people? What
does this have to do with Sippur Yetziat Mitzrayim, telling the story of the
Exodus from Egypt? The Rav explains that it places the Egyptian experience into
perspective. We might have sought to explore whether there was some sociologic,
economic, or political motivation for the Egyptians oppressors. However, we
note that in every generation and in every imaginable circumstance, enemies have
arisen to oppress us. Thus, we cannot attribute any particular set of
circumstance as the trigger for hatred of Jews. We must conclude that the
reason for the Egyptian oppression is the sad reality that Rashi quotes in his
commentary to Breishit 33:4 that it is the way of the world that Esav hates
Yaakov. The implications for the contemporary situation are painfully obvious.
Onus
Al Pi Hadibbur
We emphasize that
Yaakov went to Mitzrayim, Onus Al Pi Hadibbur, coerced by the divine instruction
to descend to Egypt. The Rav explains that we emphasize this to contrast
Yaakov’s leaving Eretz Yisrael with Esav’s exit from Eretz Yisrael. Esav
gleefully abandoned Eretz Yisrael, regarding it a nuisance. Rashi (Breishit
36:7) explains that Esav felt that the price to inherit a share in Eretz Yisrael
– four hundred years of being rootless and enduring slavery and torture as
foretold in the Brit Bein Habetarim – was too steep and was happy to rid himself
of this great burden. This attitude caused Esav to forfeit any right he had to
Eretz Yisrael when he left the country. Yaakov, by contrast, left Eretz Yisrael
unwillingly and thus did not forfeit his right to the land.
This is reminiscent of the Rama Orach Chaim 539:7 (citing the Maharil) who
states that when one leaves his Sukka because of heavy rain or some other
significant irritant his attitude should not be that he is happy to rid himself
of a nuisance. Rather, he should be upset that Hashem has exiled him from his
Sukka by sending rain or some other disturbance. Interestingly, our sages
compare the Mitzva of sitting in the Sukka with the Mitzva of living in Eretz
Yisrael. For example, the Vilna Gaon noted that the only two Mitzvot that we
fulfill with our entire bodies are the Mitzva of sitting in the Sukka and the
Mitzva of Yeshivat Eretz Yisrael.
Similarly, the attitude of those of us who do not have the privilege of
living in Eretz Yisrael should be like Yaakov Avinu and not Esav. Our attitude
should be that the circumstances that Hashem has placed upon us (familial,
economic, etc.) force us to reside outside the Land. We should not happy that
we reside in Chutz Laaretz.
Hallel
The Rav asks why don’t we sing the
Shirat HaYam at the Seder as the song that celebrates Hashem’s delivering us
from slavery. Why did Chazal choose Hallel as the celebratory song of the
Seder? He answers based on Rashi’s commentary to the Pasuk in Shmuel 2:23:1
that describes David Hamelech as the “sweet singer of Israel”. Rashi explains
“the Jewish people do not sing songs of praise to Hashem in the Bait Hamikdash
unless it was composed by David Hamelech.” The Rav notes that the same applies
to Pisukei Dizimra, where we note in Baruch Sheamar that we will sing David
Hamelech’s songs of praise to Hashem. Indeed, it is for this reason that the
Rambam (Hilchot Tefilla 7:13) records a custom to recite the Shirat Hayam, in
our daily prayers only after the Bracha of Yishtabach is recited. He believes
that since David HaMelech did not compose the Shirat Hayam its place is not in
the P’sukei Dizimra that are recited between Baruch Sheamar and Yishtabach.
Similarly, the Rav suggests that at the Seder we utilize only songs composed by
David Hamelech to sing praise to Hashem for redeeming us from Mitzrayim.
The Division of Hallel
The Rav explains why the first two
chapters of Hallel are recited before the meal and the rest of Hallel is recited
after the meal. He notes (see Pesachim 108a for a basis for this assertion)
that before the meal we should feel as if we were just redeemed from Mitzrayim.
After the meal, the mood is one of reflecting on the fact that we have been
redeemed in the past. Accordingly, before the meal we engage in Hodayah, an
expression of thanks to Hashem for redeeming us from Egypt. Hodaya may be
offered only by someone who experienced the redemption and thus may be expressed
only before the meal. Shevach (praise) on the other hand, may be offered even
by someone not involved in the event. After the meal, we can no longer thank
Hashem for redeeming us (as at that point we no longer feel as if we were
redeemed), so instead we express Shevach to Hashem for what He did for us in the
past. The Rav explains that the first two chapters of Hallel are expressions of
Hodaya and are thus appropriate to recite before the meal. The subsequent
chapters are only expressions of Shevach and thus are appropriate for recitation
only after the meal.
Shifoch Chamatcha
Many wonder why
Chazal included the plea of Shifoch Chamatcha in the Haggada. The Rav explains
that it is an introduction to the prayer of Nishmat that is recited soon after
we say Shifoch Chamatcha. In the Nishmat prayer, we pray for the arrival of the
Mashiach when the soul of all people will call out to Hashem. This is
appropriate for the Seder since Hashem introduced himself to Moshe Rabbeinu and
Am Yisrael as “I am who I am” (Shemot 3:14). Rashi (ibid) explains this term to
mean that I am with them during this period of misfortune and I will be with
them in future periods of misfortune. The Rav explains that Hashem promised
Moshe Rabbeinu that just as He will redeem Klal Yisrael from Egypt, so too He
will redeem us from future difficulties. As such, we ask Hashem at the Seder to
fulfill His promise made on the eve of the redemption from Egypt that He redeem
us from our current difficulties and send the Mashiach. Similarly, in the
Malchiot prayer of Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur we ask Hashem to bring the time
when all of humanity will recognize Hashem “and all of creation will know that
You created them”.
Accordingly, those people who do not know Hashem might be preventing the arrival
of the Mashiach. It is for this reason we ask Hashem to take His wrath to those
who do not know Him, so that an impediment to redemption is eliminated.
We may suggest a variation of this theme. We emphasize at the Seder that Hashem
fulfilled His promise He made at the Brit Bein Habetarim (Breishit 15:14) to
punish the nation that will torture and enslave us. We develop at length how
Hashem punished the Egyptians both in Egypt and at the Yam Suf. Indeed, part of
the Rambam’s (Sefer HaMitzvot 157) definition of the Mitzva of telling the story
of the Exodus from Egypt includes telling how Hashem punished our oppressors.
The point of this emphasis is to demonstrate that there is a heavenly Judge and
there is heavenly Justice, which is a general theme of Pesach (see Ramban at the
conclusion of Parashat Bo).
Accordingly, in Shifoch Chamatcha
we ask Hashem to fulfill His promise to punish our contemporary oppressors,
those who do not know Hashem, just as He punished our Egyptian oppressors.
“Those who do not know You”, that we mention in Shifoch Chamatcha, seems to
refer to those who reject the seven Noachide Laws such as the prohibition to
kill people. Even “religious” people who kill innocents seem to be included in
this prayer.
Conclusion
We hope you found these insights to be
helpful and inspiring. One might consider sharing them with his family this Yom
Tov.
Back to Rabbi Jachter's Article List
Back Home